Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) definition and meaning | AML glossary
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) definition: What it means in AML compliance.
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) are individuals who hold prominent public positions or have close associations with such individuals. Due to their roles and influence, PEPs are considered higher risk for potential involvement in bribery, corruption, or money laundering activities.
Who is considered a politically exposed person?
PEPs typically include:
- Heads of state and government.
- Senior politicians.
- Judicial or military officials.
- High-ranking executives of state-owned enterprises.
- Immediate family members and close associates of the above individuals.
It’s important to note that being a PEP is not an accusation of wrongdoing – but rather a risk classification that requires enhanced scrutiny.
Why are politically exposed persons considered high risk?
PEPs are considered high risk because of the potential for bribery, corruption, or misuse of public funds. Their access to state resources and influence makes them more vulnerable to being involved in or targeted for financial crime. Even if the PEP is not directly involved, those close to them may act on their behalf or be used to obscure illicit activity.
Why it’s important to screen for a politically exposed person.
Flagging a PEP allows firms to take a risk-based approach when managing clients and transactions. It prompts the need for:
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): More thorough background checks and ongoing monitoring.
- Greater scrutiny: Analysis of the source of wealth and source of funds.
- Internal escalation: Ensuring senior management is aware of high-risk relationships.
Identifying PEPs early helps firms tailor their compliance processes and mitigate reputational and regulatory risk.
Consequences of not flagging a politically exposed person.
Failing to identify and appropriately manage a PEP relationship can lead to serious consequences:
- Regulatory fines: Authorities may issue penalties for weak AML controls or failure to conduct proper due diligence.
- Reputational damage: Association with politically exposed clients involved in scandal or corruption can damage a firm’s credibility.
- Increased exposure: Unflagged PEPs may exploit financial services to launder money or fund illicit activity without detection.
Screening for PEPs.
Effective screening solutions use global databases to identify PEPs and their associates, even across borders and languages. Screening tools must be kept up-to-date and run continuously to catch changes in a client’s risk profile.
How technology supports PEP screening.
Firms use automated AML tools to:
- Screen individuals against global PEP databases.
- Continuously monitor for changes in PEP status.
- Flag high-risk relationships early for further investigation.
These tools help businesses stay compliant and reduce the risk of unknowingly facilitating financial crime.
We’ve worked with hundreds of regulated businesses. Let’s work together.
Book your free demo of our comprehensive ID&V, KYC, KYB and AML compliance management solution today.
Request Demo
Hi 👋 let’s schedule your demo.
Tell us a bit about yourself.
“
The system efficiently and effectively completes our KYC and KYB verification requirements during onboarding.
Robin Kear
Senior Account Executive
