Fraud Act 2006 definition and meaning | AML glossary
Fraud Act 2006 definition: What it means in AML compliance.
The Fraud Act 2006 is a key piece of legislation in the UK aimed at modernising the country’s approach to fraud. Prior to its introduction, UK fraud law was often fragmented and outdated, leaving gaps that made prosecuting fraud cases more difficult. This Act came into force on January 15, 2007, and consolidated various common law fraud offenses into one clear and concise statute.
Its primary purpose is to streamline how fraud is prosecuted, making it easier to deal with in court. The Fraud Act sets out three main types of fraudulent activity: fraud by false representation, fraud by failing to disclose information, and fraud by abuse of position.
Each of these can apply to a wide range of situations, from individual cases of dishonesty to more complex corporate fraud. In essence, it criminalises any act of dishonesty intended to cause a loss to another person or to make a gain for oneself.
Under the Act, fraud by false representation includes scenarios where an individual knowingly misrepresents themselves or their intentions in order to secure a financial benefit.
Fraud by failing to disclose information applies when a person intentionally withholds information that they are legally required to disclose, thereby misleading others.
Lastly, fraud by abuse of position addresses situations where someone in a position of trust exploits that trust for personal gain, like an employee embezzling funds from their employer.
The act significantly expanded the scope of what constitutes fraud, and its flexibility makes it applicable to a wide range of modern-day financial crimes. It helps to address complex cases, such as those involving false accounting or fraudulent activity committed through online platforms, which were not adequately covered under previous laws.
“An Act to make provision for, and in connection with, criminal liability for fraud and obtaining services dishonestly. A person is guilty of an offence if he has in his possession or under his control any article for use in the course of or in connection with any fraud.”
Legislation.gov.uk
Fraud Act 2006
What impact does the Fraud Act 2006 have on compliance teams?
The Fraud Act 2006 has direct implications for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, particularly in the way businesses and institutions are required to handle suspicious activity. The legislation focuses on the intentional dishonesty behind financial crimes, and this is where the intersection with AML practices becomes critical.
AML compliance managers must now be more vigilant in identifying, reporting, and preventing fraud-related activities within their operations. For AML compliance teams, the Fraud Act provides a framework for understanding the kinds of fraudulent actions that can trigger suspicious activity reports (SARs).
False representations, omissions of information, and abuses of positions are all forms of fraud that could involve money laundering. A failure to report such activity could not only result in the business being in violation of AML regulations but could also lead to significant penalties for both the organisation and its senior management.
One of the immediate implications of the Fraud Act for AML compliance is the need for businesses to tighten their procedures around internal controls. Since the Act highlights the importance of transparency and disclosure, AML managers must ensure that there are clear reporting mechanisms in place for employees and clients to raise concerns about potential fraud. A robust internal control framework should be in place to spot any unusual transactions or behaviours that might suggest fraudulent activity, such as a client providing misleading information or a transaction that doesn’t align with a customer’s normal business activities.
The Act also emphasises the need for thorough customer due diligence (CDD). When working with clients, it’s critical to ensure that all provided information is accurate and complete. Any attempt to withhold or falsify details can be seen as fraud under the Fraud Act. As part of your AML compliance efforts, it’s essential to implement verification processes that catch discrepancies before they turn into larger issues.
Moreover, the Fraud Act 2006 brings a heightened focus on employee and contractor conduct. Organisations need to have policies in place that prevent fraud through abuse of position, which could involve employees manipulating financial transactions for personal gain.
From a legal standpoint, the Fraud Act also places an obligation on businesses to act in good faith when dealing with suspected fraud. In an AML context, this means reporting suspicious activities to the National Crime Agency (NCA) as required. Ignoring this could result in severe legal consequences. The Fraud Act makes it clear that businesses cannot turn a blind eye to fraudulent activities; they must take active steps to investigate and mitigate any such risks within their operations.
We’ve worked with hundreds of regulated businesses. Let’s work together.
Book your free demo of our comprehensive ID&V, KYC, KYB and AML compliance management solution today.
Request Demo
Hi 👋 let’s schedule your demo.
Tell us a bit about yourself.
“
The system efficiently and effectively completes our KYC and KYB verification requirements during onboarding.
Robin Kear
Senior Account Executive
