For AML compliance professionals, the Bribery Act 2010 is closely tied to efforts to stop financial crime. Bribery and corruption are often linked to money laundering, with illicit payments being disguised through complex transactions, offshore accounts, or shell companies. If bribery takes place, there’s a strong chance that money laundering is happening alongside it.
One of the biggest challenges is identifying bribery within financial transactions. Payments may be hidden under vague invoice descriptions, routed through intermediaries, or justified as consultancy fees. AML teams need to pay close attention to high-risk jurisdictions, politically exposed persons (PEPs), and industries with a history of corruption. Enhanced due diligence (EDD) is essential when working with third parties, particularly where financial incentives could influence decision-making.
Another key consideration is corporate liability. Under the Bribery Act, businesses are expected to have adequate procedures to prevent bribery. This overlaps with AML obligations, which require firms to assess financial crime risks and implement controls to mitigate them. Strong internal policies, whistleblowing mechanisms, and staff training help create a culture where bribery and financial crime are identified and stopped early.
Failing to act on bribery risks can have serious consequences. If a company is caught up in a bribery scandal, regulators will ask what steps were taken to detect and prevent it. If money linked to bribery has been moved through the financial system, AML teams will be expected to explain why it wasn’t flagged as suspicious. This is why having a joined-up approach across compliance, legal, and risk management functions is essential.