Knowing who you are really doing business with is fundamental to preventing financial crime. Criminals use opaque corporate structures to launder money, evade sanctions, and finance illicit activities. Without a clear view of beneficial ownership, businesses risk becoming unwitting enablers of these schemes.
Regulated firms, such as banks, lawyers, accountants, and estate agents, must carry out due diligence to verify beneficial ownership. This means gathering company records, cross-checking public registries, and asking the right questions when something doesn’t add up. If a corporate structure appears unnecessarily complex, or a beneficial owner refuses to provide information, it could be a red flag.
Companies House in the UK requires businesses to submit details of their persons with significant control (PSC), but this information isn’t always reliable. Data may be out of date, incomplete, or, in some cases, deliberately misleading. That’s why compliance teams need to go further – relying on independent sources, running enhanced due diligence (EDD) where necessary, and applying a healthy level of scepticism.
AML rules don’t just require businesses to identify beneficial owners at the start of a relationship; they must also keep this information up to date. Ownership structures can change, and criminals constantly adapt to new regulations. Ongoing monitoring, periodic reviews, and scrutinising risk all play a role in keeping due diligence fresh.